Why the S&P500 Is No Longer Enough: How Data and Algorithms Can Improve Your Portfolio
- Albert Cabré Carrera
- Aug 22, 2025
- 2 min read
For decades, investors have looked at the S&P500 as the ultimate benchmark. A simple index fund tracking the top 500 U.S. companies became the go-to strategy for passive investors. And for many years, that worked: low fees, steady returns, and exposure to the largest corporations in the world.
But markets have changed. Technology moves faster, information flows instantly, and opportunities appear and disappear in days, not years. The question every smart investor should ask now is:
Is the S&P500 still enough to secure strong, risk-adjusted returns in today’s market?
The Limits of “Just Buying the Index”
The S&P500 delivers around 9–10% annualized returns over the long run. While this may sound solid, it comes with significant volatility (15%+) and no flexibility:
You are exposed to all sectors, whether they are growing or declining.
You cannot adapt to market cycles or sudden shocks.
The index does not account for individual risk profiles.
In other words, it’s a one-size-fits-all solution in a market that punishes lack of precision.
Smarter Investing with CMA
At CMA, we believe that data-driven investing is the next step beyond passive indexing. Using Big Data analysis and proven quantitative models, we design three portfolio strategies that adapt to different investor needs:
SAFE Strategy: stable returns with controlled volatility.
OPTIMAL Strategy: high growth with a strong risk-return balance.
DYNAMIC Strategy: aggressive growth potential with higher short-term fluctuations.
Unlike the S&P500, our strategies are tailored, adaptive, and backed by algorithmic insights.
Real Results: CMA vs S&P500
Looking at the data, the difference is clear:
S&P500 | SAFE | OPTIMAL | DYNAMIC | |
Annual Return (APR) | 9.95% | 18.67% | 36.08% | 45.3% |
Risk (Std. Dev.) | 15.78% | 16.24% | 27.97% | 50.59% |
Risk-adjusted Return (Sharpe) | 0.39 | 1.03 | 1.29 | 0.90 |
This means that while the S&P500 struggles to deliver consistent value per unit of risk, CMA strategies are optimized to achieve higher risk-adjusted performance.


